
The fact is that since the submission to a very specific ideological coordinates, as a declining population has put Europe in a dilemma: depopulation and mass immigration. A false dilemma, since necessarily opt for mass immigration, especially considering the submission of everything to economics. And so "is chosen" by mass immigration. To maintain stable or increased labor, at an earlier time. In this regard, it should be noted that in the short term, with a relative shortage of labor force a choice between increasing rationalization and technological development or increase as labor. The first is the social choice, the second option is plutocratic. Once started the immigration process is difficult to stop, especially if the power does not want: in recent decades, major European countries (Germany, France, Italy, Spain) has been simultaneously a brutal increase in population immigrant and a stagnation in the number of immigrant workers . This shows that mass immigration comes at a later time and not to work, but to benefit from the European welfare state. Are therefore a factor of impoverishment, impoverishment. In a third stage, which does not exclude the second and in the initial phase we are, the likely consequence of all this is either the replacement of the native ethnic group by a mixed amalgam, or the formation of a multicultural society (society euphemism multiracial), fragmented, where the oligarchy can implement fully, the policy of divide and rule. Thus, we immigration reappears as an instrument of domination of the capitalist class financial and political and media minions on the rest of the native population .
If we free ourselves of bourgeois ideological coordinates mentioned that currently dominate us, we understand that there is a way for the false dilemma depopulation and mass immigration. This solution is a popular solution, and national identity. consists of encouraging the birth of the natives, through a policy that is actually policy, therefore, is not only economically . Requires, first and obligation, to unmask the ideology of self-loathing, the etnomasoquismo. Given this, traitors, enemies of freedom and the people, say racism. We tell people, nation and identity. must be put under suspicion all the arguments trying to make us desirable or mass immigration. Where do ?, Who are they?, Who publicly defends who in secret? It should also be suspicious of anyone who says that the European birth will always be limited. Who should use the bastardeo of our race, culture and tradition? We must continue to distrust, and many of those who want to pass as non-European Europeans for many years they have been in the country or even in spite of being born in its territory. We will not tire of repeating only European European born. You have to question the definition of nationality that had been imposed to European nations. Why not Israel used a similar definition of nationality based on jus soli? (2). Why not multiculturalism for this state, while the Zionist organizations and other non-Zionist but plutocratic is imposed in Europe and North America, using their control of media and mass entertainment? (3) The fact is that they, the Zionists, do have very clear what happens to a nation when "multiculturaliza" being something you do not wish for Israel (4).
conclusion, insisting that it is essential to be very alert and decode all ideological messages that the media and, after them, the financial oligarchy, industrial and disseminate policies to the people about changing demographics and the issue of nationality.
(2) In this respect, and a denunciation of the double standards used by the press and journalists of the empire, Honsik expressively describes what follows. "The Vienna Jewish reporter Georg Hoffmann-Ostenhof, wrote: The Washington Post can not understand why the girl Born in Germany, is not always considered German. It would be desirable for the Washington Post first wonder why the Palestinians born in Israel are not Jews or Jews born in West Jordan are Palestinians, while American Protestants are no Apaches. " Goodbye, Europe. Kalergi plan. legal racism. Gerd Honsik. Bright-Rainbow, Barcelona, \u200b\u200b2005, pg. 78.
(3) It is essential to the report Who rules America? , published by the National Alliance .
0 comments:
Post a Comment