In the daily struggle against the Marxists may have some nationalists who neglect their equal obligation to fight the enemy liberal. A thorough understanding of both systems, Marxism and liberalism, leads us to the test, not surprisingly on the other hand, the familiarity of kinship, of necessary similarity between them. Sometimes ill-assorted family, but with a common goal, Marxists and liberals, placing first and only flat material, the mere satisfaction of primary human needs, real or invented, and the constant and rapid accumulation of "wealth" are devastating, if not already done so, our world. We present here some thoughts about and against liberalism by Alain de Benoist. ____
"In the liberal system has only individual dimension, together with its antithesis, the" humanity. " All dimensions intermediate : nations, peoples, cultures, ethnicities, etc., Tend to be denied, disqualified (as "products" of political action and historical, and as "obstacles" to freedom of commerce) or regarded as insignificant. Self-interest dominates the community. The "human rights" refers only to the isolated individual, or "humanity." Real individuals are perceived as reflections, such as "incarnations" of a concept Individual abstract universal. The company, which considered the European tradition of individual inclusive (in the sense that the body integrates a higher order than its component bodies), is stripped of its specific properties and becomes the sum of its inhabitants at any given time. On is defined as a collection of people arbitrarily considered to be sovereign, free and equal. Political sovereignty itself is reduced to the individual level. To be prohibited any transcendence of the principle of authority, power is no longer a delegation made by individuals whose votes join the occasion of the elections, delegation expires regularly and that power must be accountable in the manner of a president of the board of directors at the shareholders meeting. The "sovereignty of the people" is not in any way the people as such, but the unsettled, contradictory and manipulation of individuals that comprises people. To be equal individuals and communities take precedence over the uprooting becomes the rule. The social mobility, economic necessity, takes the force of law. The practice, led to consummate the theory, favors the abolition of the differences that have come to be described as "unfair" to depend on the accident of birth. This implies, as stressed by Pierre François Moreau, "breaking the natural communities, organic metaphors, historical traditions conducive to lock the subject into a set that is not chosen" (Les racines du libéralisme , Seoul, 1978, page 11).. Conception Organic of society, derived from observation of the living world is replaced by a mechanical conception , inspired by a physical social . It denies that the State can be assimilated to the family (Locke), the corporation is a body, etc.. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment