Body Rejecting Tampons Get Nauseous

Nietzsche misunderstand

There are several ways to misunderstand Nietzsche. And other more than do homologous with the dominant system of ideas today, which is one of the highest forms of misrepresentation. One is that of Professor Sánchez Meca, which, as in the preface to the first edition of his Nietzsche work. Dionysian experience world, she realizes (prologue in which we must also note the presence of very remarkable success of interpretation still missing the overall framework). No one may be surprised at this point, the difficulty of "structural" university teachers to really understand Nietzsche.

And so here we Nietzsche became a professor of philosophy worked and worried to make us question our ideas (modern), but not to reject:

"Today, nobody be shocked if someone shows transgressive and critical, for example, Christianity, militarism, or even nationalism. But what if someone seriously questioned compassion for the marginalized and the weak, feminist demands, universal suffrage, the principle of equal rights without discrimination, compulsory universal basic principles of morality, etc..? These are perhaps the foundation on which today can be our world and our society are values \u200b\u200bthat represent our living conditions, and the game of Nietzsche is not intended to undermine, destroy, invest, to convince the reader to become an antidemocratic, an anti-modern, a warmonger, a reactionary or elitist skeptical hedonist intolerant and unsupportive. The goal is not to surrender the reader what it is and will become the opposite of itself. In the challenge to the reader forward into greater self-consciousness, Nietzsche used the method that is set before a mirror reflecting the reader himself with his other, with all these other possibilities and points of view on things never arise. For only by comparison and contrast with other interpretations and values, perhaps opposite, shows the bias and the unilateral nature of those convictions themselves that never questioned. "

Nietzsche. Dionysian experience world. Diego Sánchez Meca. Tecnos, Madrid, 2006, pp. 11-12.

Good. No school. First, to understand not questioning these modern 'own convictions, "should bring into the analysis the role of propaganda. Second, given this methodology and this intention adjusted to the reality of what Nietzsche wanted to admit in the body involves the "good" philosophers. It would then another more conservative modern philosopher, Kant, as Hegel or Marx (which Nietzsche was not even in the full sense, in his brief stage positivist). His philosophy fit fully in the socio-political philosophy and political correctness today, leaving only as the philosopher bothersome, provocative, but "ours" (of yours), that shows us the weaknesses and inadequacies of the corpus of modern ideas now dominant but without question really and, if anything, an exercise of constructive-minded relativism and trainer. It would also understand the philosophy of Nietzsche as a clarifying activity, useful to highlight the relative nature of our modern ideas, then all right.

The good news is that Professor Sánchez Meca not fully meet the program outlined in the preface. And so, when Nietzsche is a matter of "problematic", Sánchez Meca ends more disagreeing with him say that doing what is not said. In other aspects and just to say, there is a proper exercise of Nietzschean hermeneutics and deep understanding of the author.